Who should regulate nanotechnology?
Filed in archive Government by george elvin on December 27, 2005

Mark Greenwood, a former senior EPA toxicology official, now a partner in a Washington, DC, law firm specializing in environmental
law, said in a recent article in the Nanotech section of MIT' s online Technology Review he believes the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, which is charged with administering the Toxic Substances Control Act, is likely to be regulating nanotechnology. But, he warns, " I don' t think that the current program is capable of dealing with the complexity, the variety, and the data needs of nanotechnology, unless they get a big infusion of resources. " Vicki Colvin, director of the Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology at Rice University, suggests in another Technology Review article that the FDA might be the right agency to regulate nanotech. But she concurs that, " the one thing everybody agrees on is that there just is not a lot of information out there. The sooner we can get technical information in hand, the better. " But she concedes the technical information will not arrive soon enough for the public to make perfectly informed decisions. " If it were a perfect world, " she concludes, " we wouldn't think about this topic for 10 years. And then all the data would be there, and we would make a good decision. But the fact of the matter is that society will be forced to make a decision in the absence of data. "
Permalink: Who should regulate nanotechnology?
Tags:
nanotechnology regulation
Trackback: http://www.creative-weblogging.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.pl/12914










