Response from: Flowers England    (10/16/06 9:52am)

This is a good competition. Thanks for the link. I’ll try to design one.

Response from: Naive    (10/26/06 1:49pm)

Why do they need a Nano-Hazard symbol as long as nanotechnology is not considered hazardous, not to mention it is very, very small, don't those people have bigger issues to worry about?

Response from: Harry    (11/13/06 11:10am)

Just wondering if my smiley face has a chance?
Did you know that in every 6 gallon of Anti Bacterial nano-silver paint there is only 2 grams of nano-particles? In other words you have to swallow the complete wall coatings of your 3 bedroom appartment and you still 10 fold under any limit. Not that there is a limit for Silver anyway.
Say NO to Nanosilver - Save the bacteria.

Response from: international online pharmacies    (05/03/07 2:31am)

Biohazard? SO 20th century! Radiation hazard? Totally passe! The latest threat to man: NANOHAZARD! Check it out here: http://www.cafepress.com/nanohazard.29430420

Response from: canadian pharmacy rx    (05/29/07 4:18am)

Biohazard? SO 20th century! Radiation hazard? Totally passe! The latest threat to man: NANOHAZARD! Check it out here: http://www.cafepress.com/nanohazard.29430420

Response from: yasmin birth control    (05/29/07 6:36am)

Biohazard? SO 20th century! Radiation hazard? Totally passe! The latest threat to man: NANOHAZARD! Check it out here: http://www.cafepress.com/nanohazard.29430420

Response from: yasmin birth control    (05/29/07 12:31pm)

Harry, I really like your smiley face, and to be honest with you, I'd totally choose it as the international Nano-Hazard Symbol, maybe just a little upgraded: I'll make it look like a fractal, you know, a smiley face made out of millions of smaller smiley faces, made out of other even smaller smileys.